Friday, February 27, 2009

Are you fit to sell??



Re/Max Proudly Presents: Fit To Sell.ca

This website is designed to give you valuable information about preparing your home for sale. In this slowing market, you need every advantage and this site offers some great tips to maximize your selling price and/or minimize the time it takes to sell. From curb appeal, to dealing with pets, to painting and decor; there are a variety of informative videos and checklists to help prepare your home.
PLUS: There is a contest to win a $25,000 viking appliance kitchen makeover.
Just remember- the most important part of selling your home is choosing the right agent. I sincerely hope you will follow this blog and judge for yourself if I am "Fit To Sell" your home.
-Enjoy the site.


Bookmark and Share

Not all bad news... (local edition)


OMB approves Port Place project




"The Ontario Municipal Board has approved the Port Place development in Port Dalhousie.
Board hearing chair Susan Campbell said the Port Dalhousie Vitalization Corp. condominium and mixed-use development "presents good planning and is in the public interest; and the appropriate mechanism for securing the retention, maintenance and protection of heritage features on site is the site plan agreement and heritage easement agreements."
In her Thursday decision, Campbell said the proposal complies with heritage planning guidelines and legislation."- St. Catharines Standard Online, 2:47pm, Friday February 27th, 2009


Although I know there are many who do not agree- what a happy day for St. Catharines! This is exactly what our beloved city needs at this precise moment in time.

Bookmark and Share

Not all bad news...


10 booming cities despite all the doom and gloom news these days.

http://finance.sympatico.msn.ca/Banking/Mortgages/healthiest-housing-markets.aspx?dub-gallery-photo-number=1

Anyone feel like moving across the country?

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Organized Real Estate is missing the boat


It's all about GREEN...
I'm not talking money, I am talking about the proposed Ontario Green Energy Act.




(looks familiar huh?)



Well my plan as I post on this blog is to fill you in little by little about myself. A little suspense keeps things interesting (if anyone cares). If no one does, then one post when I am stuck for something to write about I will do an "about me" post. Until then though, I should tell you I am a green minded individual. I am looking forward to sustainability, economic revitalization, the new responsible economy etc. Perhaps it is all a pipe dream, but we can hope right?!?



So there were a number of articles recently (both locally here in St. Catharines and on a larger scale as well) regarding Realtors opposing the Proposed Act.



I will cite a couple, but you probably don't need to read them. They all summarize roughly as follows: Realtors are afraid of "mandatory" energy evaluations at time of sale. Essentially they are worried that there is already enough pressure on the market. Accordingly, now is not the time to add red tape and cost and potentially discourage many people in the market from buying or selling.



http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20090225.GREEN25/TPStory/TPNational/Ontario/



http://scstandard.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=1450918



So here are my thoughts:


I can't agree with my colleagues who apparently call the shots. The primary reason is that as a professional Realtor I support all efforts to assist buyers in making the most informed decisions possible. From both a “green” standpoint, and a “cost” standpoint it is advantageous for buyers to be aware of the exact costs of home ownership. Any tools that we can put in place to add transparency to the transaction are advantageous. Plus, as a potential seller I would want to know that my green updates will not only save me money in the short term on utility bills, but likely increase resale value as my house being highly efficient would then clearly be more valuable then the identical energy hog next door because the cost of monthly energy use would be $X less. I don’t know why OREA opposes other then the additional expenses and complications associated with condition fulfillment might cool the market more so. I know they are also worried about some homeowners’ values declining because their houses are not up to snuff when it comes to efficiency. Ultimately though, it is our job as Realtors to assist our buyers to make as informed a decision as possible. It is in fact our fiduciary duty to serve our client’s best interest- the cost of energy use is as important to me as the costs discovered during a home inspection identifying items such as broken plumbing, aging roofs, failing HVAC etc. It is time that we Realtors raise the bar again, just like we did bringing in virtually mandatory home inspections. Obviously the market awareness and demand is there- the federal government has already awarded over $52mil to over 52,000 home owners who have completed EcoEnergy audits over the past 18 months since the program’s inception. If we back this program there excellent economic effects as well which will benefit us Realtors in the end. Think of the stampedes by sellers to home depot and to local trades to upgrade their homes. A significant portion ($1000s) gets rebated by the government so they are not out as much as they spent. The rebates include part of the inspection cost. There is also the new federal government home improvement tax credit which can be applied (up to $1350). In the near term all of this spending will keep people in jobs and likely create many new ones too. Think of the required number of new energy inspectors alone, let alone the furnace guys, the window installer, the home depot staff and the like. High employment helps keeps the real estate markets healthy.

The energy efficient upgrades also makes homes more affordable to carry which means more first time buyers will flood into the market. Sure there might be a bit of bureaucratic hassle to handle, but wouldn't it be worth it? After all, in the long term a greener and more energy efficient economy will be more profitable and productive on the Marco level.

It sure would be nice to have a cleaner world too!

Instead of opposing the legislation, let’s trumpet our support for it. It could be a great PR move for Realtors who are often looked upon with a certain level of skepticism. We are adding even more transparency to the transaction with energy audits. What a great service we would be doing the public and the planet. We would be on the forefront of the green future. I am sure that while it might hurt slightly in the short term, it will be a pleasant surprise in the long term to know Realtors care about more then their pocket books.




Seems like a winning PR move to me!!


Bookmark and Share

Silly MacLeans


This was my online post that inspired my "blogginess"

In is a response to a recent front page MacLeans Article, "The shocking truth about the value of your home." I posted this as a comment.


You can find the actual MacLeans article here:




(MacLeans photo which accompanied the article)


The Post...
I am appalled at the one-sided slanderous tone of this article.

Let me be clear- I am a professional Realtor, but I do expect that housing prices will likely fall modestly over the next few years.

Let me also be clear though- I am an intelligent and rational individual and I cannot stand to read this type of shock journalism. I am incensed by the borderline slanderous swipes at my industry and the twisted logic of the author.

Firstly, let's talk about the real estate industry's market outlook. Sure, CMHC revised their forecast, but it seems to me that doing so is quite aboveboard. They are after all a government agency, so one would assume that there is a certain expectation of honesty and integrity. That article infers that a revised forecast indicated some sort of dishonesty in the first place. Perhaps I should remind the author that it was only 4 months ago that the federal government was forecasting a surplus budget. Things changed rather quickly on the Canadian economic front.

In terms of private real estate forecasts, yes perhaps some of the real estate companies might paint a slightly rosier picture then reality I would concede. That said, as private firms, we cannot be outlandishly optimistic or it would clearly hurt our credibility with our ever-so-finicky consumers when they realize we are sailing them down the river. The vast majority of us in the business operate with integrity and high ethical standards with the fiduciary duty of protecting our clients' interest always in mind. I would like to point out that some major real estate companies (not reported in the article) did in fact forecast a significant downward trend for 2009.

Next, let's talk about the claim that the Canadian Real Estate Association (CREA) "scrubs the data". I find this to be libelous and preposterous. Let me take a moment to explain how CREA data is inputted. It is not through a bunch of Realtors sitting in a room entering the sales at some head office in Toronto. The sales data is collected through each individual agent submitting sales reports to the individual mls boards. These mls boards are integrated (through automated technological processes) to upload the data to a provincial and then national level. To say that Realtors are messing around in this process is totally ridiculous. I am ashamed that my association refused to comment, but that does not infer guilt! I would challenge anyone to take a random sample from CREA data and verify it via the land registry system. I am willing to bet on the accuracy being 99.99% or higher.

It also occurred to me that the whole basis of the "evidence" that the market will drop 20% over the next 10 years is this new futures index. Well firstly it is completely absurd and circular logic to use a speculative index as an indicator of the future and then present this as solid evidence that the market will shift. It made me wonder where the inspiration for such a detailed analysis of the Teranet futures index came from. Perhaps the author has some money invested and will benefit should the market be spooked by major publications presenting these sorts of articles. Hardly unbiased for those who "put their money where there mouth is" to want to see a negative on the market.

Finally, where is the neutrality? Like I mentioned at the beginning of this now lengthily rebuttal posting, I do expect the market to shift downwards. That said, we cannot simply assume that we will follow the same path as the U.S. in terms of housing markets. The author loosely makes this connection and to do so is blatantly wrong. There are so many key differences between the U.S problems and ours that I dare not even list them. Here are a few though: 1. Substantial legal differences in terms of bank repos mean that we don't see houses being liquidated drastically by banks which in turn drives down pricing; 2. Sub prime mortgages account for about 10X as many mortgages in the US as the do proportionally in Canada; 3. We never had the extensive and abusive so called NINJA loan programs that triggered the US slide; 4. We have a vastly different taxation system related to principal residences which means we have far more equity in our homes then our American cousins; 5. Our banks are the most stable in the world and are still operating as such.

Overall, I just hate to read an article like this and sit by idly. I hope that those that have read my posting here will agree that MacLeans should be ashamed of itself for publishing this 'report'. It is makes wild accusations and bases its predictions on circular logic. It is shock journalism and is founded on half-truths. It is ultimately quite biased and one-sided.

Ultimately, I am sad to say that I no longer trust MacLeans to report fairly and with the integrity that I thought I could expect. I guess from now on when I want to you’re your news, I will be reaching to the magazine rack in my bathroom, instead of to the top of my coffee table where I keep the scholarly publications.

Sincerely,
Scott (From St. Catharines)


Bookmark and Share

My First Ever Blog


So here's the dirt...


I like to think about things. I am not shy to share my thoughts, opinions, and advice- whether people like it or not.

If you know me, you know I like to talk. That said, you probably appreciate some of what I have to say. With that in mind I am somewhat surprised that I haven't started a blog earlier.

Let's take a quick step back about six months. I have always been a reader and a computer geek of sorts. I like politics. I like current affairs. I like to seek interesting and entertaining information in my life. As such I read a lot online and have recently (within the past six months) noticed the growing popularity of people commenting on new stories on the news sites themselves.

Well, after reading a MacLeans article today, I wrote my first ever online comment to a news agency. I couldn't seem to stop there though. There were a couple of responses and a little online banter. I partook with glee! I still couldn't stop and I frantically emailed a friend of my about another hot topic.

"Hey this is fun," I thought, "I feel like I am blogging".

And now I am.

So here is my plan:
-At least once weekly I will post;
-I will generally focus on real estate and business;
-Politics will likely come into play slightly as well;
-I am sure there will be the random odd posts related to who knows what;
-This will become my online, out-loud, think tank;
-I hope people will visit and participate and comment and converse.

Wish me luck and enjoy!



In seconds my "second ever" post will be up too, and then I will no longer bother keeping track.



Bookmark and Share